VWAP as an Indicator and Its Formula
The schedule is the heart of a algorithmic trading strategy. To compute the schedule, the strategy should first look into historical data. As an input user defines the Number of Intervals and delay between each two of them. This gives us a partition of the period since Start Time until End Time into intervals . Using the historical data strategy have to estimate how a big fraction of a volume traded between Start Time and End Time is traded in each time interval – these values are denoted by for each time interval .
Notice that the following holds:
- for each value of
On a base of the above considerations, the strategy can estimate the size of a trade that should be traded at the end of each time interval to minimize the market price strategy’s self-impact. For a -th time interval it is defined as follows:
Larger market participation does more impact on a market asset’s price weighted by volume, which is expressed by the formula:
where is every trade. Therefore strategy tries to keep steady market participation in each of intervals.
If, defined above, predictions of volume fractions in each interval are proper then the algorithm works perfectly, otherwise it can cause a considerable impact on a market price. To prevent this bad situation more advanced versions of this algorithm take into the account also actual volume and modify their schedule to fit the market conditions.
We are trading software company focused on developing the potential that cryptocurrencies bring to financial markets. Empirica is offering solutions such as Algorithmic Trading Software used by professional investors and services of development of trading algorithms, market making strategy, crypto trading bots and trading software development services for companies from capital and cryptocurrency markets.
Let’s take a look at example results calculated using these five steps on 1-minute interval intraday Morgan Stanley’s data.
|Time||Close||High||Low||Open||Volume||Typical Price||Price*Volume||Total PV||Total Volume||VWAP|
All calculations are pretty straightforward, but let us take a look at one interesting element. When you look at typical prices more than half of them (7/11) is below the last VWAP At the same time mean equals 38.917. So where does the difference come from? Volume is the culprit. In our case, a period with the higher typical price also has a bigger Volume, thus bigger market impact and VWAP calculations indicate that.
Intraday or tick
The most classical VWAP approach is based on tick-by-tick data. But as the market grows and the frequency of trades increases more resources are required to keep all calculations up-to-date. Nowadays it is nothing extraordinary for stock to have over a hundred trades per minute (true or false?). When multiplied by minutes in a trading day and number of stocks it develops into numbers that might cause some performance troubles.
With help arrives intraday data, i.e. tick-by-tick data aggregated in time periods e.g. 1-minute, 5-minute or 15-minute that contains the close, high, low and open price. As in VWAP calculations, only one price is required we have to somehow average available prices. For this task exist typical price:
Also, there is a second version of typical price that includes Open Price and it’s divided by 4.
Most likely we can point out two different strategies of reading VWAP. The first one used especially by short-term traders relies on waiting for VWAP to cross above the market price and then enter long position as they interpret price to be bullish. On the other hand, are Institutions looking to sell at this moment because they consider it a good opportunity for that day’s price.
When the price goes below VWAP value, the trend seems to be down. Institutions recognize it as a good moment to buy, but the short-term trader will look to short that stock.
Surely it’s a basic approach to VWAP interpretation. For your strategy, you would like to scrutinize e.g. the influence of price deviation from VWAP value. You should consider that VWAP behaves differently based on a period of the trading day. It’s because of VWAP cumulative nature. VWAP value is very sensitive for price changes at the beginning of the day, but insensitive at the end of the trading day.
VWAP is surely commonly used between traders with strategies described above, but on the market, there is a bunch of various indicators like VWAP that can suggest when to buy or sell shares. But there is another side of the fence.
Let’s say you want to buy 5 million shares of Morgan Stanley that is 37% of average daily volume in 2014. You cannot buy them at once, because that will impact significantly the market and the market will start to go against you. What you want to do is split the order in small pieces and execute them without impacting the market. Doing it by hand would be backbreaking, that’s what trading application has been made for.
Using trading application and VWAP Strategy, utilizing historical minute intraday files, you can easily generate average volume period profiles that will steadily buy the proper number of shares without impacting the market.
Improve your VWAP
As we mentioned in the previous paragraph there is a way to improve VWAP performance by creating volume profiles based on historical data. According to Kissel, Malamut and Glantz optimal trading strategy to meet the VWAP benchmark can be obtained by using the equation:
where X is the total volume traded, is the percentage of daily volume traded and is target quantity for each j-th period. Hence, VWAP can be calculated as below:
where is the average price level in each period.
Read more on how we develop trading algorithms for capital and cryptocurrency markets
VWAP is a really simple indicator although it can be interpreted in various ways depending on the goal and approach of the trader. It is mainly used by mutual and pension funds, but also by short-term traders. Aside from buying/selling a small amount of shares, VWAP might be used as a strategy for trading a huge number of shares without impacting the market. “Simplicity leads to popularity.”
- Berkowitz, S., D. Logue, and E. Noser. “The Total Cost of Transactions on the NYSE.”Journal of Finance,41 (1988), pp.97-112.
- H. Kent Baker, Greg Filbeck. “Portfolio Theory of Management” (2013) , pp.421
- Barry Johnson “Algorithmic & Trading DMA – An introduction to direct access trading strategies” (2010), pp. 123-126
Schedule your appointment right now to learn more
- Articles and News
- Trading Algorithms Catalog
- Algorithmic Trading System Documentation
- Request a demo
Crypto hedge Funds, trading, liquidity providers, crypto market making, low latency, arbitrage, bitcoin, crypto exchange API connections, custom investment platform, java solutions, crypto OTC desks, quantitative algorithms, trading apps development, market makers crypto, OTC brokers system, best free, profits, Kraken, Gemini, Bitstamp, Bitfinex, Tribeca, Haasbot, Haasonline, BTC, trading application development, wash trading detection, crypto manipulation, quant, fraud, machine learning, artificial intelligence, data science, blockchain and cryptocurrency developers
Algorithmic Strategies Catalog
CCI Commodity Channel Index
POV Percentage of Volume
RSI Relative Strength Indicator
Slow Stochastic Oscillator
Algorithmic Trading Strategies Development
Cryptocurrency OTC Trading Desk & Brokers Software Development
Cryptocurrency Hedge Fund Software Development
Cryptocurrency Investment Platform Software Development
Machine Learning in Finance
Binance trading bot
BitMEX trading bot
Coinbase trading bot
FTX Trading Bot
Bittrex Trading Bot
Bitfinex Trading Bot
HitBTC Trading Bot
Bequant Trading Bot
HFT in Crypto
+48 600 825 279
© Copyright 2010-2019
Empirica, financial technology company that provides:
Trading Software Development for Crypto Exchanges, Market Makers, Hedge Funds | Algorithmic Trading | Bots